Kim Mulkey Threatens Washington Post with Lawsuit During 4-minute Tirade Over Unpublished Article
In a story that has piqued the interest and concern of many, LSU women’s basketball coach Kim Mulkey has made headlines by threatening to take legal action against The Washington Post. The acclaimed coach, recognized in the basketball Hall of Fame, has accused the newspaper of preparing a “hit piece” on her. At a press conference, Mulkey unleashed a vehement tirade against The Washington Post, signaling a brewing storm in the realm of media and sports.
“I’m fed up.” – Kim Mulkey pic.twitter.com/hjVNFHmWMV
— FOX College Hoops (@CBBonFOX) March 23, 2024
Why is Kim Mulkey Upset?
The core of Mulkey’s grievance lies in her claim that The Washington Post has been working for two years on a profile piece about her. However, in her eyes, this is no ordinary profile. Mulkey described the forthcoming article as a “hit piece,” a term used to describe a deliberately damaging journalistic report. She expressed her concerns about the integrity of the piece, particularly highlighting the pressure placed on her to respond to a series of questions from the newspaper amid preparations for the women’s NCAA tournament.
Timing and Tension
Mulkey criticized the timing of The Washington Post’s inquiry, revealing that the newspaper reached out with a dozen questions, expecting a response right before a crucial game. “Are you kidding me?” was her incredulous response to the deadline set by the reporter, suggesting it was an attempt to distract her and her team during a pivotal moment. This perceived insensitivity has fueled Mulkey’s outrage and her consequent threat to sue should the article misrepresent her or her career.
The Controversial Press Conference
During the press conference, Mulkey did not hold back. She publicly criticized the working methods of the reporter involved, though she refrained from mentioning names; it was later confirmed she was referring to Kent Babb. Mulkey also hinted at unethical journalism practices by alleging that The Washington Post sought disparaging comments from disgruntled ex-LSU players and attempted to trick other coaches into speaking negatively about her. She lambasted the culture of prioritizing sales and clicks over truth and integrity, stating this is why public trust in media is declining.
Support and Criticism
The reaction to Mulkey’s outburst has been mixed. Some support her stance, appreciating her determination to protect her reputation and that of her team against what she perceives as unjust media practices. Others have criticized her approach, suggesting that it might place unnecessary pressure on her communications team and possibly intimidate journalists from pursuing their work. Regardless of one’s stance, the controversy underscores the tension between public figures and the media, especially around the portrayal and privacy of individuals in the spotlight.
Kim Mulkey, who boasts a 10-year, $32 million contract with LSU, making her the highest paid women’s basketball coach ever, has clearly stated she will fight to protect her name and legacy. While The Washington Post has not commented on the accusations or the threatened lawsuit, the situation highlights the ever-present scrutiny and challenges faced by those in the limelight, as well as the delicate balance journalists must navigate between inquiry and respect.
As the story unfolds, basketball fans, media critics, and the public at large await the publication of The Washington Post’s article with bated breath. The outcome of this confrontation may well set a precedent for how disputes between public figures and the press are negotiated in the future.
Mehek